Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Flash Pro
Subjects
Firework Effect
setInterval bug identified and fixed
setInterval bug identified and fixed
ScrollPane component doesn 't auto update
Help: MX 2004 How to script a print button to print the entire sli
Event Dispatcher between classes
memory management removeMovieClip /
MX2004 Dataset itemClassName
Order of events per frame
XML to Object help
Textfield prototype question
Flash and QuickTime VR
Reading and displaying RSS feeds in Flash MX
Flash MX 2004 Sucks
AW: [Flashcoders] Switch/Case vs If/else
AW: [Flashcoders] Switch/Case vs If/else
Flash Interface with 10mb xml file
Web Service Results
Listener Object 's best practice
 
Nutty question

Nutty question

2004-02-25       - By Bill Sanders

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3  

Simon,

Let me enlist you in an effort to bring Regular Expressions to Flash.
Rather than having to fish through a loop to find a match, using  
string.match(RegExp), you could do it with a single simple  function
that is ECMA-262 (See http://CMA-262.ora-code.com) ECMAScript v. 4 compatible.

MM does not want to add RegExp at this time for a very good reason--it
would add 20k to the player size thereby discouraging the current high
number of player downloads -- especially from the huge 56k phone modem
users. However, as we more inexorably toward broadband, the 20k becomes
less and less of an issue.

Anyway, I  along with other programmers are hoping to get this issue on
the MM radar. As FCS handles more clients and more sophisticated
functions, the incredibly powerful Regular Expressions would add a lot
to very kind of search you're talking about.

Perl programmers cannot imagine working without RegExps. (BTW, I'm not a
Perl programmer, much preferring PHP, which does include regular
expressions with preg_match() )

Cheers,
Bill

On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, at 01:40 AM, Simon Lord wrote:

> I hope this doesn't sound silly but...
>
> Rather than cycle through all the names in the list of people in a
> room, if I know the username, can I just do something direct like the
> following (where support *is* the name of the user):
>
> support.call()
>
> ... rather than loop through them all and do:
>
> application.clients[i].call()
>
> ... I haven't tried it yet, really late and I don't like to poke at the
> server when the eyeballs are watery with sleepiness.  :)
>
> Sincerely,
> Simon
>
>
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _____
bill sanders | sandLight productions | http://www.sandlight.com |
bloomfield, ct | 860.242.2260